Re: Storing sensor data
| От | Ivan Voras |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Storing sensor data |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9bbcef730905280824i514bbe91vaa567a7be4e78cbb@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Storing sensor data (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Storing sensor data
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
2009/5/28 Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>: > > One big benefit of partitioning is that you can prune old data with > minimal impact to the running system. Doing a large bulk delete would > be extremely I/O impacting without partion support. We use this for > a DB log system and it allows us to simply truncate a day table instead > of a delete -- much, much faster. Thanks. I'll need to investigate how much administrative overhead and fragility partitioning will introduce since the data will also be replicated between 2 servers (I'm thinking of using Slony). Any experience with this combination?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: