Re: Storing sensor data
| От | Kenneth Marshall |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Storing sensor data |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20090528171213.GG18879@it.is.rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Storing sensor data (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 05:24:33PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/5/28 Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>: > > > > > One big benefit of partitioning is that you can prune old data with > > minimal impact to the running system. Doing a large bulk delete would > > be extremely I/O impacting without partion support. We use this for > > a DB log system and it allows us to simply truncate a day table instead > > of a delete -- much, much faster. > > Thanks. I'll need to investigate how much administrative overhead and > fragility partitioning will introduce since the data will also be > replicated between 2 servers (I'm thinking of using Slony). Any > experience with this combination? > We use Slony1 on a number of databases, but none yet on which we use data partitioning. Cheers, Ken
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: