Re: function executes sql 100 times longer it should

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vyacheslav Kalinin
Тема Re: function executes sql 100 times longer it should
Дата
Msg-id 9b1af80e0811130744o7421d79bue68d58b04167a929@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: function executes sql 100 times longer it should  (Julius Tuskenis <julius@nsoft.lt>)
Ответы Re: function executes sql 100 times longer it should  (Julius Tuskenis <julius@nsoft.lt>)
Список pgsql-admin
Apparently your problem starts here:

> ->  Function Scan on filter_b_preke_matoma  (cost=0.00..267.50 rows=5 width=126) (actual time=6.580..11.766 rows=2820 loops=1)
>                                                  Filter: (((prek_pavadinimas)::text ~~* (('%'::text || ($3)::text) || '%'::text)) OR ($3 IS NULL))

Planner expects to see only somewhat 5 rows after function scan with the filter but get ~3000, which is not a surprise if one looks at your plain SQL query, corresponding WHERE part:

 AND ((prek_pavadinimas ILIKE ('%'||null||'%')) OR null is NULL)

As I mentioned conditions like this get wrapped (to TRUE in your case), so with plain SQL planner does not even try to estimate ILIKE filter effect.


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julius Tuskenis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: function executes sql 100 times longer it should
Следующее
От: Isabella Ghiurea
Дата:
Сообщение: db restore question/issue