Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Jones
Тема Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3
Дата
Msg-id 9ED28E1E-9F4D-4794-A1DD-0D49D085A6E6@engineyard.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Jan 26, 2015, at 2:43 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>=20
> Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> You should definitely also update to 9.3.5 (or next week, 9.3.6) =
ASAP.
>>> Even if this specific problem isn't fixed, there's a bunch of things
>>> that *are* fixed and will eventually bite you.  9.3.X has not been
>>> one of our most stable release branches :-(
>=20
>> I didn't consider the bug report in detail, but I think it's likely
>> that this was in fact the bug fixed by
>> 6bfa88acd3df830a5f7e8677c13512b1b50ae813.
>=20
> Maybe.  That would require at least one crash recovery to have =
happened on
> the server, which Erik seemed to be claiming had not happened.  But
> if there were any crashes then it would possibly fit.

Definitely nothing recent crash/recovery-wise but digging further back =
in the logs it looks like there was a crash recovery run startup back on =
2014-09-30, which was about a week after this server was created.  I =
suppose it=E2=80=99s possible that the index has been corrupt since then =
but only now showing something visible?=

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Duplicate key existant/index visibility bug in 9.3.3