Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 9902.1039969267@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken?
Re: PQnotifies() in 7.3 broken? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Do I need to increment the other interfaces that
>> _use_ libpq, like ecpg?
> If and only if the libpq API is part of their documented API. For ecpg I
> think this is not the case, but for libpq++ it would seem to be the case.
However, an app linked against libpq++ would also be linked against
libpq, and so the incompatibility will be flagged by the linker anyway.
I can see no need to bump libpq++'s own number.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: