Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Дата
Msg-id 967.1128807004@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function  ("Tony Marston" <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk>)
Ответы Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function  ("Tony Marston" <tony@marston-home.demon.co.uk>)
Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function  (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so
> others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as accepting
> an array; I think that would allow you to accept any number of
> parameters.

I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work ;-).  To me,
the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the SQL-standard
syntax.  Which surely is supported by those other databases too, no?
And if not, why are *we* the ones getting the bug report?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function