Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
От | Tony Marston |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 000001c5ccb9$06c33680$c800a8c0@ajmnotebook обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]=20 > Sent: 08 October 2005 22:30 > To: Jim C. Nasby > Cc: Tony Marston; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT()=20 > function=20 >=20 >=20 > "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes: > > And you might want to make it a project at http://pgfoundry.org so=20 > > others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as=20 > > accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept=20 > any number=20 > > of parameters. >=20 > I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual work=20 > ;-). To me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to=20 > use the SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by=20 > those other databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the=20 > ones getting the bug report? >=20 > regards, tom lane You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason that your website does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement requests. That is why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the description. Tony Marston http://www.tonymarston.net=20
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: