Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 965727.1684862910@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I've wondered about some form of instrumentation to detect such issues
> before.
Yeah.
> Could it help to have a mode where the executor shutdown hook checks how much
> memory is allocated in ExecutorState and warns if its too much?
It'd be very hard to set a limit for what's "too much", since the amount
of stuff created initially will depend on the plan size. In any case
I think that the important issue is not how much absolute space, but is
there per-row leakage. I wonder if we could do something involving
checking for continued growth after the first retrieved tuple, or
something like that.
> Random aside: I've been wondering whether it'd be worth introducing an
> in-place representation of Bitmap (e.g. if the low bit is set, the low 63 bits
> are in-place, if unset, it's a pointer).
Why? Unlike Lists, those things are already a single palloc chunk.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: