Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9561.1179150062@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes: > Stephen Frost wrote: >> I'm curious as to which Unix systems allow multiple processes to listen >> on the same port at the same time.. On Linux, and I thought on most, >> you get an EADDRINUSE on the listen() call (which the postmaster should >> pick up on and bomb out, which it may already). > Linux certainly does. Mmm, you're right, I misread the man page: Setting the SO_REUSEADDR option allows the local socket address to be reused in subsequent calls to bind(). Thispermits multiple SOCK_STREAM sockets to be bound to the same local address, as long as all existing sockets withthe desired local address are in a connected state before bind() is called for a new socket. The bit about "connected state" is relevant here --- a listening socket isn't connected. Time for more caffeine. > Windows seems to treat SO_REUSEADDR in the same > way as SO_REUSEPORT which just seems wrong. Well, Microsoft getting standards wrong is no surprise. So what do we want to do about it? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: