On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 06/24/2009 10:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Andres Freund<andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>>
>>> I found the issue. The code compares '(unsigned int)(-1)' with
>>> '(size_t)(-1)' which works on 32bit but not on 64bit.
>>
>> Thanks Andres - patch applied.
>
> I havent read very much of the code, but at a very quick glance a short
> policing for issues of this kind looks sensible - unfortunately I cant do
> this in due time (I think I have spotted some more comparisons of this kind
> - I am not sure how big the influence of those is though).
Yeah, that certainly wouldn't hurt. If you spot anything in passing,
please point it out.
We're not going to get a full review done before release now anyway...
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com