Re: Bad link for win32/latest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Дата
Msg-id 937d27e10809240033o7c1723d6m1e4beb423399e2ac@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bad link for win32/latest  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: Bad link for win32/latest  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-www
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
>> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Folks,
>>>
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to
>>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3.
>>>
>>
>> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4
>> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/
>
> I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out
> soon :-)
>
> I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did we
>  say "keep current and one older"? In that case, there is some removing
> to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
> 10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
> have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have
> source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not
> very consistent :-(
>
> If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-)

Marc was managing that (and the symlinks) iirc. I'm not sure what
rules he was working to.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Why do we block browsing of the documentation directories?