Re: Bad link for win32/latest

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Дата
Msg-id 48D9D41A.60903@hagander.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bad link for win32/latest  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Ответы Re: Bad link for win32/latest  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Список pgsql-www
Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 September 2008 14:08:58 Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/binary/latest, which should point to
>> 8.3.4, is still pointing to 8.3.3.
>>
> 
> Actually the whole main directory needs to be updated, it isn't listing 8.3.4 
> or 8.2.10... http://wwwmaster.postgresql.org/ftp/

I've updated svr1, I *think* that's the master and it should push out
soon :-)

I can never remember, on what schedule do we remove old versions? Did wesay "keep current and one older"? In that case,
thereis some removing
 
to do as well... In binary, for example, we have 8.2.5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and
10 ATM - that just seems like a waste of space to me. For source, we
have 8.2.7, 9 and 10, and in the 8.3 series 8.3.1, 3 and 4. We also have
source/OLD which has 8.3.0, 8.2.5 and 8.2.6. All in all, seems we're not
very consistent :-(

If we don't have a policy, let's make one - get your arguments out :-)

//Magnus



В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Treat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad link for win32/latest
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bad link for win32/latest