Sorry. I thought I had cut most of the redundancy
> On Aug 11, 2019, at 2:26 AM, Peter J. Holzer <hjp-pgsql@hjp.at> wrote:
>
>> On 2019-08-10 21:01:50 -0600, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> On Aug 10, 2019, at 8:47 PM, Souvik Bhattacherjee <kivuosb@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> Thanks for the response.
>>
>>> Yes, but you will some code via client or function that batches the
>>> inserts for you.
>>
>> Could you please elaborate a bit on how EXP 1 could be performed such that
>> it uses bulk inserts?
>>
>> Best,
>> -SB
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:26 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>> wrote:
>>
> [70 lines of full quote removed]
>
>
>> Top-posting (i.e. putting your reply at the top is discouraged here)
>
> He didn't really top-post. He quoted the relevant part of Adrian's
> posting and then wrote his reply below that. This is the style I prefer,
> because it makes it really clear what one is replying to.
>
> After his reply, he quoted Adrian's posting again, this time completely.
> I think this is unnecessary and confusing (you apparently didn't even
> see that he quoted something above his reply). But it's not as bad as
> quoting everything below the answer (or - as you did - quoting
> everything before the answer which I think is even worse: If I don't see
> any original content within the first 100 lines or so I usually skip the
> rest).
>
> hp
>
> --
> _ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now
> |_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated
> | | | hjp@hjp.at | management tools.
> __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>