Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split

On 04/06/2017 03:21 PM, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> 
>> Hmm.  I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems
>> we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and
>> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and
>> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go
>> a little further and do all of that together.
> 
> Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this patch. Here is a new
> version.

Committed, thanks.

- Heikki