Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Remove unused argument in btree_xlog_split

Hi Robert,

> Hmm.  I don't see anything wrong with that, particularly, but it seems
> we also don't need the distinction between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L and
> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_L_ROOT or likewise between XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R and
> XLOG_BTREE_SPLIT_R_ROOT -- in which case I think this patch should go
> a little further and do all of that together.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this patch. Here is a new
version.

--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev