RE: Big 7.1 open items
От | Mikheev, Vadim |
---|---|
Тема | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C3A@SECTORBASE1 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Big 7.1 open items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.1 open items
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Well, I don't see any reason not to use tablespace/database > > > rather than just tablespace. Seems having fewer files in > > > each directory > > > > Once again - ability to use different tablespaces (disks) > > for tables/indices in the same schema. Schemas must not dictate > > where to store objects <- bad design. > > I am suggesting this symlink: > > ln -s data/base/testdb/myspace /var/myspace/testdb > > rather than: > > ln -s data/base/testdb/myspace /var/myspace > > Tablespaces still sit inside database directories, it is just that it > points to a subdirectory of myspace, rather than myspace itself. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Didn't you mean ln -s /var/myspace/testdb data/base/testdb/myspace ? I thought that you don't like symlinks from data/base/... This is how I understood Tom' words: > The symlinks wouldn't do any good for what Bruce had in mind anyway > (IIRC, he wanted to get useful per-database numbers from "du"). Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: