Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the 
>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would 
>> be non-trivial.

> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some 
> buildfarm testing going.

My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
        regards, tom lane