Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the
>>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would
>>> be non-trivial.
>>>
>
>
>> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some
>> buildfarm testing going.
>>
>
> My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
> depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
> breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
>
>
>
Fine by me.
cheers
andrew