Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Staubo
Тема Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Дата
Msg-id 88daf38c0705241048l42296d4bra57ccdccaa754f99@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Ответы Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
Список pgsql-general
On 5/24/07, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> wrote:
> > [2] Nobody else has this, I believe, except possibly Ingres and
> > NonStop SQL. This means you can do a "begin transaction", then issue
> > "create table", "alter table", etc. ad nauseum, and in the mean time
> > concurrent transactions will just work. Beautiful for atomically
> > upgrading a production server. Oracle, of course, commits after each
> > DDL statements.
>
> Rdb/VMS and CODASYL DBMS (both Oracle, formerly DEC, products) also
> have transactional DDL.

Not exactly mainstream databases, and Codasyl isn't even a relational
database as far as I remember.

> Interbase/Firebird probably also has transactional DDL.

Apparently. I'm surprised, given how InterBase and Firebird otherwise
feel so awfully ancient.

All right, so not unique, but very rare.

Alexander.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Ericson Smith"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
Следующее
От: "bruce"
Дата:
Сообщение: postgres - oid question