On 25/09/17 20:31, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 09/25/2017 10:19 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 25/09/17 18:48, Alvaro Hernandez wrote:
>>>
>
>>> In my opinion, logical decoding plugins that don't come with core
>>> are close to worthless (don't get me wrong):
>>>
>>
>> I respectfully disagree.
>
> As do I.
But Petr, without saying why, it does not help much to the
discussion ;)
>
>>
>>> - They very unlikely will be installed in managed environments (an area
>>> growing significantly).
>
> Whether or not they are included in a managed environment is generally
> based on two things:
>
> 1. Safety (why RDS doesn't allow certain C extensions)
> 2. Community/Popularity (Exactly why RDS has PostGIS)
> A. Demand with a prerequisite of #1
This is very clear. Now tell me: how many output plugins do you see
included in RDS. And in GCP's PostgreSQL? Azure Postgres? Heroku?
I'm looking at this from the practical perspective: if you would
want to write a middleware for PostgreSQL that would rely on logical
decoding, you definitely want to run on this platforms, or you are out
of the game. If we want PostgreSQL to integrate more easily in nowadays
very heterogeneous environments, this is key. And relying on
non-included-or-acceptable-in-many environments output plugins is not,
IMHO, a viable nor sensible option. I'd rather stick to test_decoding or
pgoutput, no question.
>
>>> - As anything that is not in core, raises concerns by users.
>
> I find this a rather failing argument in today's market. If they are
> willing to migrate to Postgres, they are more than likely willing to
> use other open source software. Especially when combined with an
> expert telling them to.
>
>
>>> - Distribution and testing are non-trivial: many OS/archs combinations.
>>>
>
> Yes, it is. Why would we want to increase that burden to this community?
That's a different story, and one I cannot argue against. If
easying postgresql integration with other tools is not something of a
priority or something the core group cannot add to all the stuff on
their shoulders, all my due respect. PostgreSQL users will do without,
someway, somehow. But IMHO this should be a really high priority, and
saying that this would turn PostgreSQL into an Oracle code base is going
too far ;)
Álvaro
--
Alvaro Hernandez
-----------
OnGres
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers