Re: BUG #17147: Why concat_ws and concat is not immutable?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #17147: Why concat_ws and concat is not immutable?
Дата
Msg-id 880379.1629123726@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #17147: Why concat_ws and concat is not immutable?  (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: BUG #17147: Why concat_ws and concat is not immutable?  (RekGRpth <rekgrpth@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения 
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Why concat_ws and concat is not immutable?

Those invoke datatype-specific output functions, which aren't guaranteed
to be immutable.  Maybe ideally they would be, but we have too much
historical baggage --- for example, timestamp_out has always depended
on DateStyle.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql crash when running a procedure with an inout parameter and a commit
Следующее
От: Chuck Nellis
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: Re: psql crash when running a procedure with an inout parameter and a commit