Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> From a user point-of-view, it might be simplest to provide a
> "restore_directory" option, besides restore_command, and handle the copy
> ourselves.
Even more user-friendly would be to provide default working archive and
restore commands, maybe simple shell scripts using rsync. But it's not
clear it's the time to do that.
Regards,
--
dim