Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> The original thinking was to use CONCURRENT, and CREATE CONCURRENT INDEX
> sounded like a different type of index, not a different way to build the
> index.  I don't think CONCURRENTLY has that problem, so CREATE
> CONCURRENTLY INDEX sounds good.  To read in English, it would be read as
> CREATE CONCURRENTLY, INDEX ii.

That doesn't sound like English at all to me.

Fwiw, I think the best option was what Tom did. The gotcha I tripped on seems
pretty minor to me.

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com