"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Or we could apply Peter's patch more or less as-is, but I don't like
> that. I don't think it solves the stated problem: if you know that CASE
> branches 3 and 5 don't match, that still doesn't help you in a monster
> query with lots of CASEs. I think we can and must do better.
Do we have something more helpful than "branches 3 and 5"? Perhaps printing
the actual transformed expressions?
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about
EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!