John Scalia <jayknowsunix@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been asked to make our setup a little more secure. So, I thought
> I would restrict which servers could replicate from our primary.
> However, it does not appear that 9.6.3 can use a FQDN entry for this
> parameter. Plus, our hostnames include "-" characters, and that seems
> to break the system as well. Shouldn't synchronous_standby_names
> accept a FQDN with a dot or a dash in the hostname or is this maybe a
> bug? (Flame suit on)
HBA file is where you restrict access based on IP/netmask or DNS names.
synchronous_standby_names has nothing whatsoever to do with this.
HTH
> --
> Jay
>
>
--
Jerry Sievers
Postgres DBA/Development Consulting
e: postgres.consulting@comcast.net
p: 312.241.7800