Re: Outstanding patches
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Outstanding patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87ptthhq6y.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Outstanding patches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Outstanding patches
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of > a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would > be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion? I seem to recall > some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we > resolved them. Last I heard, we had concluded that SQL2003's notion of a sequence is sufficiently close to ours that the differences are mostly syntax. (Note that SQL99 does not define sequences.) Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: