Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of
> a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would
> be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion? I seem to recall
> some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we
> resolved them.
Last I heard, we had concluded that SQL2003's notion of a sequence is
sufficiently close to ours that the differences are mostly syntax.
(Note that SQL99 does not define sequences.)
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC