Re: Outstanding patches
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Outstanding patches |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5578.1036646825@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Outstanding patches (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Outstanding patches
Re: Outstanding patches Re: Outstanding patches |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I will be applying outstanding 7.4 patches on Friday:
> http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
> If anyone wants those rejected/modified, please let me know.
array upper/lower bound: missing doc updates, otherwise seems okay.
\pset pager always: I thought we had rejected that idea in favor of
making the whether-to-use-pager decision pay attention to width as
well as number of lines.
temp tables: difficult to comment on a message that does not include the
proposed patch.
CLUSTER ALL patch: I have a problem with this, specifically the fact
that it changes CLUSTER into a multi-transaction operation. That
renders CLUSTER non-rollbackable and not callable from functions.
After all the work we went to to make CLUSTER rollbackable, this seems
like a giant step backward.
CREATE SEQUENCE syntax changes: did we decide whether SQL99's notion of
a sequence is close enough to ours that migrating to their syntax would
be a good idea, and not just a source of confusion? I seem to recall
some doubts being voiced about this (by Peter?), and I'm not sure we
resolved them.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: