Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
| От | Neil Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87ptt05dp5.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits (Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Closing inactive connections OR user connections limits
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes: > Basically I came this morning to find a developer had a bug in a program > and used up all the connections. Could I have safely killed those > connections? kill(1) the backends in question. > In all the archives I read there seems to be a negative view on timeouts. > I think that after 4 hours of no activity, at least in my case, I > definitely want those connections dead. The superuser_reserved_connections feature we added for 7.3 should be sufficient for this -- if the maintenance tasks are done as the PostgreSQL superuser, there will be some reserved "slots" for them to connect to. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: