Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
| От | Christopher Browne |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87mz5tn68d.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations ("Daniel van Ham Colchete" <daniel.colchete@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
After a long battle with technology, mstone+postgres@mathom.us (Michael Stone), an earthling, wrote:
> [1] I will say that I have never seen a realistic benchmark of
> general code where the compiler flags made a statistically
> significant difference in the runtime.
When we were initially trying out PostgreSQL on AIX, I did some
(limited, admittedly) comparisons between behaviour when compiled
using GCC 3.something, VisualAge C, and VisualAge C++. I did some
modifications of -O values; I didn't find differences amounting to
more than a percent or two between any of the combinations.
If there's to be a difference, anywhere, it ought to have figured
pretty prominently between a pretty elderly GCC version and IBM's top
of the line PowerPC compiler.
--
output = reverse("gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/linuxdistributions.html
"I doubt this language difference would confuse anybody unless you
were providing instructions on the insertion of a caffeine enema."
-- On alt.coffee
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: