Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 87bq5ma51p.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds] (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCHES] 64-bit CommandIds]
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <zb@cybertec.at> writes: > Hi, > > what's your opinion on this? > I saw response only from Alvaro on the -patches list. I don't understand. The patch only affects configuration and SQL data type code. It doesn't actually store the 64-bit commandid anywhere which would be the actual hard part. Do "phantom" command ids mean this all just works magically? Ie, the limit of 2^32 <cmin,cmax> pairs is still there but as long as you don't have to store more than that many you get to have 2^64 raw ephemeral commandids? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: