"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> This patch implements Florian's idea about how to manage snapshot xmax
> without the ugly and performance-losing tactic of taking XidGenLock and
> ProcArrayLock at the same time. I had to do a couple of slightly klugy
> things to get bootstrap and prepared transactions to work, but on the
> whole it seems at least as clean as the code we have now. Comments?
Just that it will be fascinating to see what effects this has on the
benchmarks.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com