Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1
Дата
Msg-id 8768.931643460@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
>> I'm seeing no problem with cvs sources from yesterday evening.  I think
>> you must have a corrupted copy of one of the files --- not heapam.h,
>> evidently, but maybe something it depends on.  Try removing and
>> refetching everything that was pulled by your last cvs run.

> Still no luck :-( I did fresh cvs checkout.

I just did one too, and diffed it against what I had before.
There's still nothing that looks broken.

After looking again at your message, I wonder whether the rest of us
are chasing the wrong idea.  The message you sent looked to be corrupted
text, because it mentioned '^Time_t' and so forth.  But now I wonder
whether that error wasn't just in your cutting and pasting of the
error message.  If we take the messages at face value they seem to
indicate that type time_t is not known to the compiler when it processes
heapam.h, which would make sense if <time.h> hasn't been included yet.

And, right offhand, I'm not seeing where <time.h> gets included before
heapam.h is read.

Has anyone changed anything that might affect where <time.h> gets
included?  Perhaps this is a configuration problem.

Oleg, how long ago did you last pull a working fileset?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SELECT DISTINCT question
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1