"Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> If it's a bad way to do it, that's certainly an argument for keeping
> (or maybe generalizing) intagg.
There was actually a patch this past commitfest to *add* functionality to
intagg. When I reviewed it I said it would make more sense to generalize it
and integrate that functionality into the base array operations.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!