>> If it's a bad way to do it, that's certainly an argument for keeping
>> (or maybe generalizing) intagg.
>
> There was actually a patch this past commitfest to *add* functionality to
> intagg. When I reviewed it I said it would make more sense to generalize it
> and integrate that functionality into the base array operations.
I suppose it's just a question of finding enough round tuits.
I might take a look at it but my grasp of toasting and memory
management may not be good enough yet.
...Robert