On 1/5/22 11:03 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:
>
> There was similar work being done for system periods, which are a bit
> simpler but require a side (history) table to be created.
This is false. SYSTEM_TIME periods do not need any kind of history.
This was one of the problems I had with Surafel's attempt because it was
confusing the period with SYSTEM VERSIONING. Versioning needs the
period but the inverse is not true.
--
Vik Fearing