Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8414.1143605598@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function? ("Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Exposing DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR via a libpq function?
            		
            		 | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
"Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> That's making the assumption that you know which libpq.  I was hoping to
> have a psql commandline
> Switch to dump the info, but with your objection(s), I'll just crawl back
> under my rock.
It's not that I don't feel your pain ... but if you don't know what
version of libpq you're using, I don't see where you get to assume that
psql is invoking the same version as your app-that's-actually-broken.
Seems like there's not any substitute for some forensic effort here.
On the server side, recent discussions about getting pg_ctl to behave
sanely in the face of non-default configurations have been leading me to
think about a proposal like this:
postmaster --show-value guc-variable-name other-switches
with the behavior of parsing the postgresql.conf file, interpreting the
other-switches (which might include -D or -c that'd affect the result)
and then printing the value of the guc-variable to stdout and exiting.
This would allow pg_ctl to deal with issues such as non-default
unix_socket_directory.  Doesn't fix your problem of client-side
configuration variation, but would do a bit for the server side.
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: