Re: Logical Replica ReorderBuffer Size Accounting Issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gilles Darold
Тема Re: Logical Replica ReorderBuffer Size Accounting Issues
Дата
Msg-id 83b1108f-9552-3ebb-35fc-e00ac9ff0cf1@darold.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Logical Replica ReorderBuffer Size Accounting Issues  (Alex Richman <alexrichman@onesignal.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Le 16/02/2023 à 19:08, Alex Richman a écrit :
Hi all,

Looping back to say we updated to 15.2 and are still seeing this issue, though it is less prevalent.

Thanks,
- Alex.

On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 11:16, Alex Richman <alexrichman@onesignal.com> wrote:


On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 10:10, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
Alex,
Do we see this problem with small tuples as well? I see from your
earlier email that tuple size is ~800 bytes in the production
environment. It is possible that after commit 1b0d9aa4 such kind of
problems are not there with small tuple sizes but that commit happened
in PG15 whereas your production environment might be on a prior
release.

Hi Amit,

Our prod environment is also on 15.1, which is where we first saw the issue, so I'm afraid the issue still seems to be present here.

Looping back on the earlier discussion, we applied the malloc patch from [1] ([2]) to a prod server, which also fixes the issue there.  Attached is a graph of the last 48 hours of memory usage, the ~200GB spikes are instances of the LR walsender memory issue.
After patch is applied (blue mark), baseline memory drops and we no longer see the spikes.  Per-process memory stats corroborate that the LR walsender memory is now never more than a few MB RSS per process.

Thanks,
- Alex.


Hi,


Amit / Wang Wei do you have a better patch to fix this bug or should we use the one provided by Alex? I have tried some other fixes but it's a fail, you may have better understanding of the problem and the way to fix it.


Best regards

-- 
Gilles Darold

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrey Lepikhov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Clause accidentally pushed down ( Possible bug in Making Vars outer-join aware)