Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bossart, Nathan
Тема Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Дата
Msg-id 82C5CC71-A60F-44B9-BA60-DDBC9A43B79E@amazon.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 12/7/21, 5:21 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>> I agree with Tom.  I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
>> attached) and call it a day.
>
> Thanks. v5 patch looks good to me.

I've marked the commitfest entry as ready-for-committer.

Nathan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements
Следующее
От: Peter Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: parse_subscription_options - suggested improvements