Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Дата
Msg-id 8023.1201793339@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
>> Effect: we would stop receiving complaints that an old pg_dump can talk
>> to a server that most likely is incompatible with it.  People would
>> learn on the spot that they must install the newer pg_dump.

> I think a more moderate measure might be to clarify the error message
> "aborting because of version mismatch  (Use the -i option to proceed 
> anyway.)\n"

I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read
the message.  My complaint is really directed at certain admin packages
(and they know who they are) that invoke pg_dump *by default*, behind
the user's back, with -i.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG: type of "xxxx" does not match that when preparing the plan