Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Дата
Msg-id 200801311602.m0VG23C28750@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> >> Effect: we would stop receiving complaints that an old pg_dump can talk
> >> to a server that most likely is incompatible with it.  People would
> >> learn on the spot that they must install the newer pg_dump.
> 
> > I think a more moderate measure might be to clarify the error message
> > "aborting because of version mismatch  (Use the -i option to proceed 
> > anyway.)\n"
> 
> I would be satisfied with that if I thought people would actually read
> the message.  My complaint is really directed at certain admin packages
> (and they know who they are) that invoke pg_dump *by default*, behind
> the user's back, with -i.

Oh?  That isn't good.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died