Re: Replication

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mike Christensen
Тема Re: Replication
Дата
Msg-id 7aa638e00906241213v1e1d0d63p2174afc633fcfd98@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Replication  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Replication  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Replication  (Geoffrey <lists@serioustechnology.com>)
Re: Replication  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
We need to stop this thread, you guys are making me want to ditch Postgres and get Oracle (after taking out a second mortgage on my house that is)..

Mike

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
Craig Ringer wrote on 24.06.2009 04:07:

Thomas Kellerer wrote:
Mike Christensen wrote on 23.06.2009 19:37:
Does anyone actually have that (any node can go down and the others still
replicate amongst themselves?)
I think this is what Oracle promises with their RAC technology.

Isn't RAC a shared-storage cluster?

As far as I know it is also a cluster of servers which can even hand over the processing of a single statement "in-flight" if the node goes down that is current processing the statement.

Thomas



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8.4 RC1 on ubuntu 9.04 jaunty, problems after install
Следующее
От: "Bayless Kirtley"
Дата:
Сообщение: Serious JDBC problem