Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Leonardo-san,
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> The wording should be something like "CLUSTER requires transient disk
>> space equal to about twice the size of the table plus its indexes".
>
> Could you merge those discussions into the final patch?
> Also, please check whether my modification broke your patch.
> Thank you.

It sounds like the costing model might need a bit more work before we commit this.

...Robert