Re: Order by and timestamp

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Björn Lundin
Тема Re: Order by and timestamp
Дата
Msg-id 7D74B8B5-DFBD-4B5B-85C6-A516343E49C1@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Order by and timestamp  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Order by and timestamp
Re: Order by and timestamp
Список pgsql-general


16 mars 2020 kl. 01:41 skrev Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
On 3/15/20 2:33 PM, Björn Lundin wrote:
I then did ’select * from AMARKETS order by STARTTS’

Is amarkets in more then one schema?

Yeah, it's hard to think of any explanation other than "the query used a
corrupt index on startts to produce the ordering".  But your \d doesn't
show any index on startts.  So maybe there's more than one amarkets
table?

Yes - in other schemas - described in reply to Adrain
But the schema_path does not point to them
And those two other tables are empty


Another possibly-useful bit of evidence is to see what EXPLAIN shows as
the query plan for this query.

bnl=> explain select * from amarkets order by startts;
                              QUERY PLAN                               
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Sort  (cost=10702.57..10939.29 rows=94691 width=106)
   Sort Key: startts
   ->  Seq Scan on amarkets  (cost=0.00..2875.91 rows=94691 width=106)
(3 rader)

--
Björn Lundin




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Björn Lundin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Order by and timestamp
Следующее
От: Nicola Contu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Streaming replication - 11.5