Re: Order by and timestamp

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
> On 3/15/20 2:33 PM, Björn Lundin wrote:
>> I then did ’select * from AMARKETS order by STARTTS’

> Is amarkets in more then one schema?

Yeah, it's hard to think of any explanation other than "the query used a
corrupt index on startts to produce the ordering".  But your \d doesn't
show any index on startts.  So maybe there's more than one amarkets
table?

Another possibly-useful bit of evidence is to see what EXPLAIN shows as
the query plan for this query.

            regards, tom lane