On Dec 11, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Yeah that works, as soon as VVV is the version we upgrade from.
>
> That said, we need to find a way to lighten the process for extensions
> where it's easy to have a single script to support upgrade from more
> than once past release.
>
> What about having the following keys supported in the control file:
>
> upgrade_<version> = 'script.version.sql'
> upgrade_all = 'script.sql'
Why not just use an upgrade script naming convention? Think: Convention over configuration.
> Where the version here is the version you're upgrading *from* (to is
> known and static when you distribute the files after all), and where
> upgrade_all is applied last no matter what got applied before.
>
> Also, do we want a subdirectory per extension to host all those files?
How are things currently arranged?
Best,
David