Re: Extensions, patch v16

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: Extensions, patch v16
Дата
Msg-id 5DE8CFF0-9D47-4894-BF26-60EC13825E21@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Extensions, patch v16  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: Extensions, patch v16  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:09 PM, David Fetter wrote:

>> Why is it in the makefile at all?  If the makefile does need to know it,
>> why don't we have it scrape the number out of the control file?  Or even
>> more to the point, since when do we need version numbers in extensions?
>
> We *absolutely* need version numbers in extensions.  People will want
> to have a certain version, or a certain minimum version, etc., etc.,
> etc., just as they do for any other software.
>
> Seriously, are you OK?

One of the biggest mistakes in the creation of CPAN was allowing modules without extensions. It makes figuring out what
toupgrade extremely difficult. Learning from that, PGXN requires version numbers for all extensions. 

Best,

David



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: keeping a timestamp of the last stats reset (for a db, table and function)
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;