Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7961.1552498252@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> I recall having noticed someplace where I thought the relcache partition
> support was simply failing to make provisions for cleaning up a cached
> structure at relcache entry drop, but I didn't have time to pursue it
> right then. Let me see if I can reconstruct what I was worried about.
Ah, here we are: it was rel->rd_partcheck. I'm not sure exactly how
complicated that structure can be, but I'm pretty sure that this is
a laughably inadequate method of cleaning it up:
if (relation->rd_partcheck)
pfree(relation->rd_partcheck);
Having it be loose data in CacheMemoryContext, which is the current state
of affairs, is just not going to be practical to clean up. I suggest that
maybe it could be copied into rd_partkeycxt or rd_pdcxt, so that it'd go
away as a byproduct of freeing those. If there's a reason it has to be
independent of both, it'll have to have its own small context.
Dunno if that's related to hyrax's issue, though.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: