Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Grzegorz Jaskiewicz
Тема Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Дата
Msg-id 6F1713A3-03C8-4BD6-9A2F-EF79C8380205@pointblue.com.pl
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Closing some 8.4 open items  (Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11 Apr 2009, at 13:33, Hitoshi Harada wrote:

>> Maybe trigger functions should be displayed separately too than ?
>
> You don't catch the point. The aggregate entries in pg_proc have
> prosrc = 'aggregate_dummy', which means they're dummy and the entities
> are stored in pg_aggregate. Triggers in pg_proc are dummy? No, they
> are actually plain functions with trigger return type.

yes, that's from strictly insider's point of view. Based on the  
implementation of that in postgresql, but you guys talk about user  
perspective, after all - psql is for users, not only for postgresql  
hackers.
So the better question would be, can you use window, aggregate,  
trigger functions the same way other procedures ? I guess the answer  
is no :)
Hence, if classify - than I would suggest to do it completely and  
fair, and not judge it only from postgresql-hacker perspective.

I am hardly the postgresql-hacker myself, so it is my opinion from  
user perspective, that also understands where your opinion comes from.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hitoshi Harada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items