On 30 mar 2009, at 17.24, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that
>> function
>> PQinitSecurity.
>
> Agreed. Although, both PQinitSecure and PQinitSecurity are very
> general names. "Security" can mean a lot of things. Maybe the name
> should be more particular, like PQinitOpenSSL. I think its okay to
> reference the openssl project name being how this function is
> designed to work with openssl's library split.
>
+1
It's quite likely that well want to support another ssl library in the
future. At least likely enough that any api we define should take it
into consideration.
/Magnus