On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On 30 mar 2009, at 17.24, Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> wrote:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>
>>> BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that function
>>> PQinitSecurity.
>>
>> Agreed. Although, both PQinitSecure and PQinitSecurity are very general
>> names. "Security" can mean a lot of things. Maybe the name should be more
>> particular, like PQinitOpenSSL. I think its okay to reference the openssl
>> project name being how this function is designed to work with openssl's
>> library split.
>>
> +1
>
> It's quite likely that well want to support another ssl library in the
> future. At least likely enough that any api we define should take it into
> consideration.
+1.
...Robert